a question of light

(Katherine Lowry talks about her journey with the light design on ‘Summer’)

My role as lighting designer is also that of a story teller, but instead of using words, I use a palette of angles, intensities, tones, hues, tints, colours, and shadows to paint a visual and emotional landscape with.  The first thing I did on reading Summer was to make a note of the landscapes and locations of the text.  The Mountain, North Dormer, Nettleton, the Red and Brown houses, the library, etc.

To begin with a lighting concept, I like to start by considering the qualities of the light in each situation.  For example, what time of day is it?  What time of year?  Is the source natural like the bright, morning sunlight thrown across the meadow or a small, low stove in the corner of the Brown house?  It really gives a sense of the world I’m trying to create by researching how a space is lit naturally before I start to make any artistic choices.  Having done my homework I discovered that what I had to work with was a very multi-locational piece, ranging from the vast, endless summer skies across the mountain, right down to cramped, dank interiors of the destitute ‘heathens’ who dwell on it’s side.

This was an exciting challenge for such an intimate space like The Jack.  In terms of equipment, there was very little at hand to ‘paint’ all these physical spaces, and then create the shifts in time and place and the quality of the light on top.  Such was the case, it meant that every choice I made regarding source, angle, and colour had to be pretty carefully considered!

With this aside, it then came down to thinking about what I wanted to do with it artistically and stylistically.  Feeling that the themes of light and dark, expanse and limit, were at the forefront of Summer, I decided to look at paintings of the New Hampshire region and see how others had interpreted the landscape.  I wanted to see how they painted the light on the mountain tops, the glittering ripples on the lakes, and the little kisses of sunlight on the trees.  It was this that led me to stumble upon the Hudson River School of Painters, and what a find!  This 19th century American art movement embodied a group of landscape artists whose main focus was the Hudson River Valley and it’s surrounding area of the Adirondack, Catskill, and White Mountain ranges.  What’s more their aesthetic vision was heavily influenced by Romanticism, a movement which validated strong emotions as an authentic source of aesthetic experience, especially the emotions experienced in confronting the sublimity of untamed nature.  This stuck with me like glue and I felt strong parallels here to Wharton’s Summer, for example, her use of aesthetic language describing the firework display on the 4th of July as a metaphor for Charity and Harney’s emotional and sexual union; the way that Harney finds something outstanding and beautiful about Charity’s ‘untamed nature’, and the use throughout of pathetic fallacy, and the way the weather and landscape is used by Wharton to describe the emotional undercurrents of Charity’s world.  This group of painters seemed to cover every natural event that took place in the play from the warm, dawn light creeping up over the hills, to the crisp, bright, midday beams thrown across the meadows Harney and Charity lounge in, not to mention some dramatic changes into evening.  Stunning colours blasting the sky and oppressive, black storms clouds gathering with increasing anger.  I felt I’d really hit upon something here and I knew that this would be my inspiration for how I wanted our Summer to look.

I have to admit, I got a bit carried away with my research.  I looked at maps of New Hampshire, listened to 19thcentury American composers, and of course, pored over the Hudson River School paintings just to really immerse myself in the place.  It was when I was looking a little more closely at this group that I discovered an offshoot style called Luminism.  I thought to myself “THIS is what I’ve been looking for!”  I started to look at the Luminists and although their compositions focus on the more tranquil, soft side of nature, it was the way they painted the light that really captured my imagination.  Luminism has its emphasis in light and shadow, often with an exaggerated light source, and its this sense of light and contrast which makes the subject glow.  It’s exactly this chiaroscurist approach which I wanted to use in order to enhance the delineation of the characters and the set.   I hope that in keeping it simple and

a yound woman sits on a chair

Joanne Gale as Charity Royall

dramatic, it’s enabled the changes in the lighting at key moments to communicate the feelings and emotions of the characters in their surroundings.  Summer is such a strong and emotionally raw play that it was hugely important for me to keep the lighting uncomplicated, and use the subtle shifts in tone and angle to work with the set and the score and really allow what’s at the heart of the play to sing out.

To finish with I’d like to share a piece of my journey with you.  Here is a selection of the paintings I discovered during my research, which I’ve put together a short film (click here to watch). I hope you enjoy it!

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

score to stage

Millie Cook writes about composing for Summer

a young woman carries a cello

Millie and Cello

I was asked to write a simple score for Summer back in November, and I worried about connecting with the script and the characters. As a sound designer, the majority of my work is done without the actors present, either at home, or in the technical rehearsals.

As a cellist, I am really passionate about the complex spectrum of emotions that the sound of a cello can evoke. I love how sweet and light it can sound, but also how melancholy it can be. I knew straight away that I wanted to use solely the cello as my performance medium, because it is such a close part of who I am as a composer and a designer, but also because Summer has so many different paths emotionally, and the cello seemed to reach all of them.

(listen to the music composed for Charity’s first entrance – Charity and North Dormer)

a young woman tunes her cellow

Millie tuning her cello

Summer was really different. I was invited to rehearsals from the earliest stages. I was allowed to play and improvise with scenes and was given incredibly supportive feedback from Tim and from the cast. I began by writing 6 short pieces, and after I played them to the cast, it was really interesting to see how they connected each piece with different characters and locations. After this, I used those themes to put together the final ‘suite’.

The opening of the play starts with Royall lit through darkness, whilst the Mountain theme plays (opening moment, (Royall coming down from The Mountain (composed by Millie Cook). This is two cello parts blended together in a low register, and is quite akin to the kinds of folk songs I imagined the community on the Mountain would write. It is then followed by Charity’s theme, which is the only piece in a major key. However, this piece was not intended to be cheerful, but almost tedious- to reflect Charity’s simple and perhaps bored existence in North Dormer, before Harney’s arrival.

a young woman plays the cello

all about the composition

The Love Theme (listen Love Dance for ‘Summer’) was an extension of a shorter piece I wrote initially. It consists of a pizzicato cycle that plays under a gradual development of tension between two cello melodies. In a way, the 3 melody lines represent the three characters; the constant pizzicato reflecting Royall’s loyalty, and the two intertwined bowed parts representing the two lovers. The play finishes with a reprisal of the love theme, a directors choice which poignantly highlights the separation.

Writing for Summer has been a completely new process for me- because I was plunged into the discoveries the actors were making, and encouraged to express them through music.

I loved the response and I think the story will keep me writing more and more, even after our run.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Reviews of “Summer”

A young woman looks to the future

Joanne Gale as Charity Royall

‘Alesya Bolotina’s set design is simple yet effective, with only two tatty chairs and a bench to evoke the New England setting. It’s the lighting design, by Katherine Lowry, that really lifts the space, teasing out the hidden colours of Bolotina’s set, and conveying a sense that there’s more going on here than meets the eye. The small studio space has been reconfigured, and this new set up allows director Timothy Stubbs Hughes to create a real sense of flow and pace’ EXEUNT

‘Francis Adams’ Lawyer Royall is the most forcefully rendered character and a curiosity around his history and motives deepens as he is simultaneously represented as an aggressive drunk, an affectionate guardian and a lecherous opportunist.’ EXTRA! EXTRA!

two men talk while a young woman sits by

Harney and Royall discuss their thoughts

‘The production benefits from some excellent performances. As Charity, Joanne Gale has an enchanting stage presence. She conveys the often petulant and disdainful nature of the character without ever resorting to arm-flailing melodrama. She’s never less than believable’ EXEUNT

‘Joanne Gale portrays spunky Charity with fervour, she is quick witted and at times a little brusk as teenagers can be. There’s a lovely chemistry between her and Jeffrey Mundell who plays Lucius, the blossoming relationship is played out subtly.’ BroadwayBaby.com

a yound woman sits on a chair

Joanne Gale as Charity Royall

‘The character of Charity is beautifully drawn, strong but also vulnerable, frustrated by the expectations placed on her sex by society.’ EXEUNT

‘Music and sound effects composed and arranged by Millie Cook are engrossing; string arrangements lend a sense of gravity and foreboding from the earliest scenes.’ EXTRA! EXTRA!

a young woman watches

Charity watches closely

‘The performances are good, with Joanne Gale capturing the headstrong girl with all the sarcasm and moodiness that you’d expect from a teenager without seeming incongruent to the time. Francis Adams is perfectly cast as the patriarchal Royall, creating a good man whose morals you can begin to mistrust as the story unfolds. In the second half, there is a lovely moment as he addresses the audience (as the townspeople) and you get a real sense of his guilt and fear underneath his speech. Mundell, in a subtle performance, builds a steamy chemistry with Gale and the two express a very convincing love for each other.’ One Stop Arts

‘One would anticipate the relationships between these three characters, specifically chosen by the writer to carry the plot of an entire novel, to be intense and flagrant, but somehow each one remains emotionally and physically independent from the others to a considerable extent.’ EXTRA! EXTRA!

Posted in Our Book, Production | Leave a comment

moments from North Domer

Watch moments from rehearsal and production…. enjoy.

Posted in Our Book, Production | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Wharton’s ‘Hot Ethan’

Avril Horner is an Emeritus Professor of English at Kingston University. Her research interests focus on women writers of the 19th and 20th centuries and Gothic fiction. She has published widely (with Sue Zlosnik) on the novels of Daphne du Maurier and, with Janet Beer, is the author of several articles on Edith Wharton’s work as well as a book on Wharton’s late novels entitled ‘Edith Wharton: Sex, Satire and the Older Woman’, published by Palgrave Macmillan in 2011.

In her novellas Ethan Frome (1911) and Summer (1917), Wharton uses extremes of climate and remote settings to help create heightened atmospheres heavy with sexual tension.  Not for nothing did Wharton herself refer to Summer as her ‘hot Ethan’. In these two works, characters are confined in buildings and trapped in small, inward-looking communities where people play out dull and constrained lives.  As in her short stories, much is left implicit: ‘I had the sense that the deeper meaning of the story was in the gaps’ (p.9) the narrator of Ethan Frome tells us in the first few pages. In both novellas, sexual attraction is inflected by a quasi-incestuous desire which adds another dimension of the unsettling and the uncanny to an already threatening and claustrophobic atmosphere.  After a difficult early life, Charity Royall has her ‘summer’ of happiness with Lucius Harney, one of Edith Wharton’s many attractive but ineffectual male characters. However, her happiness is short-lived and she is ‘rescued’ from the shame of becoming an unmarried mother by a turn in the plot that still has the power to shock and disturb.

One of Wharton’s five personal favourites (the others were The Custom of the Country, The Children, Hudson River Bracketed and The Gods Arrive), Summer is a powerful work that divided opinion from the very beginning, when it received mixed critical reviews upon publication. More recently, the American critic, Candace Waid, has argued that the pain and suffering of Summer is redeemed by a renewal of life in various ways – unlike the pain and death we see in the bleaker Ethan Frome.  Like that earlier novella, Summer has enormous dramatic potential, and it will exciting to see Julia Stubbs Hughes’s adaptation unfold upon the stage of the Jack Studio Theatre.

Posted in Edith Wharton, Our Book | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Drawing on the past

Harney – “I’m an architect and I’m looking at the old houses in these parts.”

Charity – “Everything’s old in North Dormer.  The people are, anyway.”

In Summer, Lucius Harney introduces Charity Royall to topics she had barely considered before his arrival. Here, retired Architect and Town Planner Martin Stearman talks about conducting research like Harney’s.

“You want to go out into the local countryside and do some research on traditional local buildings, how would you go about doing it?”

Well, (he laughs) assuming the houses are in a village… walk up and down and around, check around the backs of the houses. See if you can see, or get into, the yards. What you are trying to do is to find the essential characteristics of what it is you are trying to capture.

The house, if it has been there a long time, will have had lots of alterations, but there might be one…there might be one just around the corner that actually hasn’t has too much done to it, hasn’t been improved. You might just find a glimpse of the corner, jutting out across an alleyway, or something like that.

I mean, I think there is a big difference between going out to make a sketch of some old buildings and the completely different technique of going out to survey and to record as accurately as you can, visually, but without actually measuring.

If you take the first one, the first case, “I want a sketch of a beautiful building”; you look for the picturesque.  You look for the one that’s got the interest in it, where you can emphasise the perspective. Where you can show the building in its context, i.e. if you take the alleyway that’s going past it, you can show that this is where the building will interact with people.

On the other hand, if you’re there to try and record every timber, every joint of the building then you need to stand full square on, back the other side of the street, make sure you’ve got the full width, make sure you’ve got the thing correctly proportioned.

Slight marks on the paper first just to indicate the corners of the building and the height of the roof. You’re setting a scale for it, and then you can fill in the detail. Then you can create the main verticals, put the top of the arch in, bring up the curve of the doorways, fill in the detail. 

Once you’ve the general structure then you can concentrate on detailed bits of timber work, the way the framing ends, what’s happening at the edges, how the roof hangs over, whether it’s got a gutter, all those things. But you only go for the important detail. There is so much usually that there is to be seen, that you must just pick out that which is essential. In a sense, it’s creating a cartoon. If you’ve got a camera you can record every detail of it, but your sketch is to carry the essence of the building back to your desk so you can continue your research.

Here Martin talks about training to be an Architect 

Posted in News, Our Book | Tagged , | Leave a comment

We have all the time in the world?

Francis Adams, who is playing Lawyer Royall, contemplates the shifting importance of time and how it is impacting both on his life and within ‘Summer’

As someone whose experience of time has changed dramatically over the past 6 months, I wanted to explore the concept of Time: how I see the passing of time in the play and how it relates to everyday experiences.

time passing

sands of time

Time plays an important part in the novel and as such becomes thematically significant. After all the novel and subsequent play take their name from a season. Seasons divide up the year and mark time. I find a marked distinction in the rhythms of the towns of North Dormer and Nettleton, their inhabitants and also the principal characters. The dead and dusty old library has lost all sense of time and simply exists; it appears to suck the life and vibrancy that Charity feels when she takes in her countryside. The arrival of New Yorker Lucius Harney quickens her heartbeat and excites Lawyer Royall with his news and tales from the progressive city. A change also happens in Harney: no doubt experienced in city ways and the hustle and bustle, cut and thrust of a newborn metropolis, his study of the houses in Eagle County allow his pace to slow and enable him to reflect on his own prescribed course in life. In taking Charity to the Nettleton July 4th celebrations, Harney brings Charity more in-line with his own city rhythm, by enabling her to experience another society. Having acheived this, the couple settle down into a domestic blissful rhythm of regulation love-making.

a peaceful village in england

a peaceful village in england

I have endeavoured to make a study of time in relation to my own life. Born in a small country village, my early recollections are similar to those of Charity, of fields and fun; of woods and camping out (sadly there are no mountains in Berkshire). I moved to London a couple of years ago when I began my actor training. Travelling in a city in present day has a rhythm completely different to that of the county. We city dwellers and workers are well aware of when our rhythm is broken. A dawdling tourist or unsteady pensioner, even (heaven forbid) a parent and buggy travelling in the rush hour can cause tuts a plenty! I find that a journey back to my birthplace in the country slows my clock down to an extent. Sufficiently programmed, reverting to a country tempo causes some difficulty, but surely prolonged exposure to any lifestyle especially the country life will slow it down.

The rural descriptors, the theme of nature and the role of the landscape influences the way time passes for the characters in Summer. My previous studies and experience of working on American plays lead me to believe that the size of a place and landscape, even the weather influences the inner clock of the individual and thus the personality of the inhabitants. If you consider that one has to travel long distances to achieve the most basic of functions (acquisition of groceries, fuel, human company), then the time taken to achieve these basic functions must influence one’s own sense of rhythm. In big places it takes more time to perform these tasks and I have found the personality of folks from large land mass areas have a more relaxed attitude to life. It even affects the way they speak. I have a Texan buddy with the most wonderful drawl. Living in a city with its immediacy and compactness places more pressure on time. Increasingly I find myself bypassing certain shops or forgoing certain tasks if, when I get there a queue of more than 4 people has formed (this is almost impossible in places like Homebase or IKEA!). Something that would never have occurred when I lived in a rural location.

One also has to take into account mode of transport. If legs, then one’s destination has to be of reasonable distance in relation to the task to perform in order to make it a viable journey. I remember some years back holidaying in Dorset with a group of friends. We rented farm cottages and the local pub was a good 15 minute yomp. Naturally our need for beer outweighed the prospect of a 30 minute uphill straggle home. There were some (mostly couples), who visited the local off licence, but I like to think that those of us who frequented The Cross Keys had a broader, more culturally vibrant sojourn.

Of course when horsepower comes into play, whether 4 legged or 4 wheeled, then the distance differs. Through much of her life Mrs Wharton travelled extensively. She enjoyed excursions by car travelling about Europe. It has been documented that whilst living in France, Mrs Wharton modelled some of the descriptions of the Eagle County landscape on recollections from her times touring French villages. The car does make many destinations and prospects available to the motorist, providing of course that the route to the destination is navigable. Sadly places that offer little or make difficult destinations are bypassed. The once ornate 18thC houses of North Dormer that Harney sketches, surrounded by the advancing forest seem to bear this out. The industrialised world has started to forget North Dormer because it takes too long to get there so it is only natural that the inhabitants leave and join the rat race.

Tube too hot

Evening Standard billboard about London Undergroud

In past months my wife and I have discussed moving out of London back to my hometown. In Summer, Royall’s wife forces this exact move. So what has prompted this discussion? It is not that we don’t like where we live. A fantastic sense of community exists in our part of London. However we began to feel that a countryside existence would suit our family better. Time, Air, closeness to nature, slower pace of life, space, all of these influencing factors have run through my head engendering a feeling of “wouldn’t it be good?” But the converse has started to appear: the isolation, the disparate community, snobbery and remoteness. Maybe we have it right? We do not live in the city but on the outskirts close enough to nature. Ok, there are the hoards of people working at different paces to get by, but is that such a bad thing? I suppose that where I live occupies a convenient middle ground. All my needs are met. And so I stay.

So what prompted this meandering submission? Quite simply last August I became a father and have experienced dramatic change in the amount of time that I have now that I am a parent, as opposed to the amount that I had when I was a ‘single’ man.

duck on water in the sun

duck on water in the sun

My philosophy was that there is always enough time. 24 hours amply allows sufficient time to complete any task. 24 hours is immovable. The earth’s orbit about the sun is constant. Admittedly summer days possess more daylight than winter ones, but it remains an immovable universal fact that 24 hours form a day. However now, rather than having all those 24 to myself, I have to share them with my little one. My time is no longer my own. A proportion of that 24 hours is now dedicated to my child. Believe me, if I had a way of slowing down time I would just so that I could devote the same amount of time to both my passions – my family and my work.

I suppose the final question, dear reader, is: How can I make more time in order to enjoy them?

Time will tell.

Posted in Edith Wharton, Our Book, Production | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Lucius & Jeffrey: an intertextual session

Jeffrey Mundell explores the comparisons between himself and the character of Lucius Harney through the power of architecture.

While Lucius explores the rural landscape of New England, Jeffrey draws some of London’s oldest theatres.

Sit back and enjoy this personal video from Jeffrey – assisted by a pencil, a rubber and a piece of paper…

Posted in Edith Wharton, Our Book, Production | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

A moment of costume

Last week, the cast of Joanne, Francis, Jeffrey, the designer Alesya, and stage manager Jude, spent a good few (far too many) hours at the Academy Costumes in London SE1.

Here are a few moments from our time there.

Posted in Our Book, Production | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Wharton as seen on film

Julia Stubbs Hughes, the playwright of Summer, looks at three of Edith Wharton’s other novels that have been adapted – for film.

During the period of development for Summer, I looked again at how other artists have adapted Edith Wharton’s works – principally on film – to see the sort of choices they made in presenting her material. Three particularly stand out – The Age of Innocence, The House of Mirth and Ethan Frome – and although a number of silent films were made of her novels, as well as a version of The Age of Innocence in 1934 with Irene Dunne, a 1939 film of The Old Maid with Bette Davis, and a version of The Reef with Timothy Dalton and Sela Ward, called Passion’s Way made in 1999 – its these three in particular that interested me.

production still from film 'The Age of Innocence'

production still from the film 'The Age of Innocence'

Probably the most high profile is Martin Scorsese’s The Age of Innocence (1993), with a stellar cast in the main three roles of Daniel Day-Lewis, Michelle Pfeiffer and Winona Ryder. Its certainly sumptuous to look at, courtesy of cinematographer Michael Ballhaus and production designer Dante Ferreti, and you see 1870′s New York in all its emerging glory. Scorsese dazzles us with his bold use of colour in the film – yellow filling the whole screen for a moment in between two scenes, in reference to the yellow roses that Newland has bought for Ellen. The extreme etiquette of the world is also well presented, with balls, trips to the opera and dinners, all elaborately staged to regimented perfection. It’s from this stifling world that you can understand why Day-Lewis’ Newland Archer seeks escape. It also contains some effective performances – Winona Ryder being the most nominated of the top three for her sweet and yet icily perfect portrayal of May Welland. But two things about it stop it for me from being wholly successful – one is the obtrusive use of narration (albeit well read by Joanne Woodward), as it leaves little for the audience to decide for themselves and makes you think that Scorsese and his screenwriter Jay Cocks felt they couldn’t tell the story without it; the other, seems to be something that occurs in all three of these film adaptations – the accents that are chosen. In this movie, we hear an English accented American, that I can only guess was to create, or possibly simulate, an upper class feel to the milieu. However I think, at times, it brings a slightly stilted quality to the performances. You feel the actors aren’t able to be really free in the parts and so come away with an odd feeling of detachment.

production still from The House of Mirth

production still from the film 'The House of Mirth'

British director Terence Davies’ version of The House of Mirth (2000) is a no less lavish adaptation, which was probably quite a feat as his budget must have been nothing like Scorsese’s. Filmed predominantly in Glasgow, the film certainly looks gorgeous and although set in 1905, some 35 years after The Age of Innocence, it presents the audience with the same upper class world and constraints. Gillian Anderson looks like one of Rossetti’s paintings as the novel’s heroine, Lily Bart at the start of the story – all vibrant red hair and haughty demeanour. But her fall from society’s grace, is swift and cruel and she cannot be saved by her true love Lawrence Selden, played in one of the film’s very best performances by Eric Stoltz. Again, Davies has assembled a top collection of American actors for the project – Laura Linney, Anthony LaPaglia, Terry Kinney and Dan Aykroyd among them – but again, we do have them performing with the same slightly clipped English / American accent. It’s curious. Whether that was how upper class New York society people spoke at the time, I wouldn’t know and I wouldn’t presume to say that the filmmakers haven’t made their choices based on authentic reasons but you are left feeling a little distanced from their world and their tragedies, when of course Wharton’s themes of forbidden love, betrayal and disgrace are totally universal.

production image of Ethan Frome

production still from the film 'Ethan Frome'

John Madden’s Ethan Frome (also 1993) is like the novella from which its adapted, it stands apart from the rest of Wharton’s stories about New York society, as it looks at the lives of people in rural Massachusetts who are nowhere near the level of Lily Bart at the beginning of The House of Mirth or Newland Archer in The Age of Innocence. In Ethan, it has a particularly tragic figure in Liam Neeson’s towering performance – a young man studying engineering, who is pulled back to the farm where he was born when his mother takes ill. After her death he enters into an ill-fated marriage to his cousin Zeena (played with tight-lipped dissatisfaction by Joan Allen) and then falls deeply and dangerously in love with her cousin Mattie Silver, when she comes to live at their house to look after Zeena. It’s a story that spans 30+ years and the snowy landscapes that are evoked so powerfully in the novella are beautifully shot by Bobby Bukowski (who’s recently been Oren Moverman’s director of photography on The Messenger and Rampart). We see the cruel nature of fate in a quiet, measured way in Madden’s film – nothing is too overblown and like the novella, it hits you with a real power. The only thing that puzzles you when watching the film is the accents. At times, you hear a distinct kind of southern twang in the delivery, which seems at real odds with the New England setting of the story – when people talk of Boston, you hear a kind of deep south intonation. Again, I wonder what research was undertaken by director John Madden and his team, to arrive at such a point. An interesting conundrum.

All of which brings me to Dangerous Liaisons. Not an Edith Wharton novel I know but I mention it because I think it’s possibly the best literary adaptation I can think of on film and one that marries so brilliantly, an effective, concise text by an Oscar winning Christopher Hampton with powerful, emotional performances from the actors – Michelle Pfeiffer again, John Malkovich in a career-defining portrayal and best of all, a truly exquisite Glenn Close (the film’s final scene with her contemplating her future alone is one of the finest single pieces of acting you are ever likely to see). This is what I aspire Summer could be on stage – actors who are able to use their own voices (the characters are not going to be speaking American, or a mixture of American / English), so that they are free to embody the character and their emotions, hopefully creating rich, detailed performances; and in respect of the script, I have moulded the dialogue to have one foot in the past, in terms of its sentence construction but also to feel modern in its immediacy (cannot becomes can’t, for example), which hopefully drives the story along for the audience.

When I first read the novel, after seeing Ethan Frome on film, I initially wanted to make it into a movie, as the filmic aspect of the book just jumped right off the page. I was amazed that no-one had yet done so but then decided to challenge myself in making it into a piece for theatre. However, before too long we may finally see Summer on film, as it’s currently being developed by Carl Sprague, the Assistant Art Director on The Age of Innocence who also worked on the BBC tv serialisation of The Buccaneers. I’ll certainly look forward to see what approach he employs with the material and I hope he enjoys the journey of adapting it as much as I have.

Posted in Edith Wharton, News, Our Book | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Charity in Spring

Joanne Gale writes about her thoughts and assumptions on the character of Charity Royall

“I haven’t got anybody belonging to me, the way other folks have”

photograph of a child in a lovely dress

photograph of a Victorian child

Here are some thoughts I have on Charity at the moment and what we have found so far with our reading, rehearsals and journey. There is a lot to say about anyone, but a few things we have noticed is that Charity is a young woman starved of discovery in life. She is bored, smart but has not had much schooling and out of various reasons has chosen not to go to school and is stuck in a world of no great change, slow movement and mainly older people, in both age and attitude. People who do not want to change and have accepted what they have but not always in a positive way.

photograph of a woman in a nightdress looking at the camera

photograh of a woman in an nightdress

She is trying to escape but it’s rather a vicious circle; she needs money but there are no well paying if any, jobs, she is not greatly educated, she can’t afford to travel, she can’t move out without husband or money and it takes so long to earn anything that it’s very difficult to save enough… something that still happens today. How do we do things without money? How do we get money? Does it stop us? Do we need others to help us? Is it luck, fate or choice? I feel she experiences all the normal feelings of a young woman; worry over her appearance, the want to find a decent and worthy man for her or a decent opportunity although what we have found interesting is that she does not think of marriage before Harney appears and although she has managed to get a job in a small library, she does not read any of the books, at least not anymore. She has insecurity about her class and family history although she is proud and does not give the community any ammunition to talk bad of her. She has a temper at times. She does what she likes, goes out late at night. She is poor as Royall does not give her much money and she has been living without a mother, probably since around 10 years old but yet she has managed to develop into a woman worth noticing, a keeper of a home and seems to be able to manage. It has been interesting exploring how much we think Charity knows about her past, how slow and sheltered and monotonous the world of North Dormer is. She is also definitely Christan but we never see her go to Church or see her pray, which is Edith’s choice as well as Julia’s. In North Dormer service is only every other Sunday, as the town is too small to hold a service weekly… says something about how rock n’ roll the town is.

Does Charity discover love in the story?

photograph of a wet road with track marks

photograph of a road after rain

If nothing else she certainly discovers the feelings of first love, of feeling wanted and of wanting, of opening something of yourself up to someone for the first time and of course the worries about others seeing this and there thoughts, gossip and what is expected traditionally. Do we do what is expected or go with what feels right; what feels right could be the most amazing thing we experience and we could grown from it but is there a risk, are there consequences? From reading it has been so interesting to see the consequences women of the time could suffer for consummating or even just being seen with a man outside of marriage and the social attitude of the ‘fallen’ women. What Charity does in loving Harney socially is a huge thing and people’s attitude could be so derogatory of this. Charity’s mother and family history is also interesting. Women who were prostitutes at this time were considered the lowest of the low, sinful, outcast. Women’s role in life and their main aim was to be a good wife and mother and women who stained this in any way were degraded and socially and morally had sinned. Prostitutes were not considered worthy of family life or children so Charity, essentially could be guessed to be an accident, brought up in a world and society that did not want her and a mother who may have seen her as an inconvenience to her work and life, something she could not afford, or maybe Charity was the reason her mother had to turn to prostitution.

black and white photograph of a woman in a corset

woman in a corset: credit to The Horst Estate and Hamilton's Gallery

Times were changing though and Summer feels like it falls in that time where North Dormer’s old ideas were clashing with New York’s new. I think we sympathise with Charity, in a way she is a victim of fate, a victim of bad judgement, in a way a victim of someone else’s stupidity, or of being in the wrong place at the wrong time. But also there is a feeling of maybe she should have been more careful, maybe she should have followed the rules, listened to other people, remembered her past and what her mother had been sooner. There seems to be no right answer and also by the end of the story, who knows if the life Charity is going into is going to be bad, it could be better.

Sex has its part in the story and from our reading we know that Summer is certainly the most explicit of Wharton’s writing and apparently caused quite a stir when it was published. Of course it also appears to reflect Wharton’s sexual awakening and liberation.

Today I think we worked out there are potentially 7 weeks of love making time in the play and sex in the story is purely out of feeling, there is no financial or class gain.

photograph of Joanne Gale and male friend

Joanne gale and friend

In the time of Summer sex was a hushed subject and not really considered a thing women could enjoy. It was immoral, women should do it as little as possible with their husbands and women who committed adultery or ‘fell’ were certainly looked down on and had sinned. Sex was for marriage and production and marriage was for class or financial gain and/or keeping and although society has changed massively in this way it can still be interesting how some attitudes live on a little; I remember doing some work with young people last year and one of the them saying to me why is it ok for men to sleep with lots of women but if a girl sleeps with lots of men she is called a whore?

Still has some similar theme of women ‘falling’ if sex is not related to marriage. I think women of today can still suffer with the thought and worry about sleeping with a man too soon, following ‘rules,’ how much we can talk openly about sex or if a women enjoys sex too much is that bad. I do not doubt though in the story that Charity does have deeper feelings for Harney and I am sure other women of that time found themselves in similar situations and suffered for it also.

painting of a victorian woman in a pink dress

painting of a woman in a pink dress

I toy with the idea that Charity knows in a way that she is never going to be with Harney from the beginning. Their situations are too different. She has some doubts from the start, although the fairytale does, to an extent, happen for her; she loves the prince and does so in the right way, she only makes love to him once he has wooed her properly and out of deeper feelings and they both have those deeper feelings and wants. It’s just he doesn’t whisk her off to his castle.

It has been wonderful exploring into Wharton’s life, the world of Summer, America in this time and I have loved thinking and exploring Charity so far. There is so much more to learn, we are only really scratching the surface.

Posted in Edith Wharton, Our Book, Production | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Summer by Edith Wharton « Word by Word

“I love words, language, sentences, metaphors, stories long and short, poetry, reading and writing”.

Claire McAlpine’s latest post on her book blog ‘Word by Word’ is an insightful review of the novel Summer. Click the link below to read:

Summer by Edith Wharton « Word by Word.

Posted in Edith Wharton, News, Our Book | Tagged , | Leave a comment